The Wall Street Journal has a nice story out today detailing many of the things I've been highlighting at CreditMattersBlog.com during the past month. Despite the Federal Reserve's attempt to stimulate the economy with lower interest rates, and despite the fact that the prime rate has continued to drift lower, credit-card customers have not benefited. Indeed, instead of enjoying lower rates on credit cards, many customers have actually seen their rates climb substantially.
Customers from American Express, Citibank, Nordstrom and elsewhere have seen their rates climb, even when some of their customers have performed flawlessly. Indeed, Nordstrom's recent hike was directed toward every one of its 2 million customers. What's more, customers cannot opt out of the rate increase (story link here). Ditto American Express, which is raising rates by an average of two to three percentage points (link to comments section) on some of its customers -- and not offering an opt-out provision, either.
Citibank, meanwhile, is allowing customers to reject its latest rate increase, but cardholders will ultimately see their cards get closed (story link here) if they decide not to accept the rate change. Take a look at the comments section of the story I did on Citibank. Pay special attention to some of the profiles that my readers sport. One of my readers posted this late last night: "The increase will take my purchase APR to 14.99%. My FICO score is 740 and I have never had a late payment to a creditor in the 17 years I've had credit," this person writes. "I have carried a balance on this card in the past but I just paid this card off last month. I have 3 other credit cards with APR's under 10%, so Citi will be the last card I use now (if at all)."
Citibank is supposedly raising rates on less than 20% of its customers. I have a question, though: if Citibank is raising rates on a reader with a 740 FICO score and a flawless payment history, who is safe? Let's just say that I'm beginning to wonder how accurate that 20% figure really is.
Even when card companies aren't lifting interest rates on their customers, they're busy finding other ways to ding them. Earlier this month, for example, I highlighted Discover's new balance-transfer-fee policy, which removes the fee caps that used to be in place (story link here). Chase is getting in on the act as well, implementing monthly service fees and higher minimums on customers who have not paid their outstanding balances down quickly enough (story link here).
In the meantime, this comes from the Wall Street Journal story: Retailers are also getting stingier with credit. Home Depot Inc. reduced credit lines on its in-store cards, which are issued by Citibank, for customers with delinquent accounts or those whose credit scores have dropped dramatically. Nordstrom Inc. began notifying customers that it was raising interest rates on its store credit cards, while Target Corp., which has also raised interest rates and late fees, is issuing fewer cards and reducing spending limits as customer delinquencies have jumped sharply.
Many big banks reported weak credit-card results for the third quarter, with "charge-offs" -- reflecting loans considered to be uncollectible -- rising to over 5% of total credit-card balances and poised to deteriorate further.
"Some credit-card issuers are desperately looking to recoup their charge-off losses by increasing interest rates or hiking punitive fees," says Gwenn Bezard, a research director at Aite Group LLC, a research firm. "Those rates or fee increases can affect consumers that are perfectly good customers."
Card issuers cite the current economic turmoil to explain the changes. "Obviously, this is something we're doing to reflect the cost of doing business," says Desiree Fish, an American Express spokeswoman.
That's just a taste of the story. Mary Pilon and Jane Kim, the reporters who worked the story, do a terrific job of putting the rate and fee hikes into perspective. Indeed, the reporters (with a little help from Ann Zimmerman) give the story a nice scorecard feel to it. At the end of the story, in fact, there's a nice table summarizing the various moves that credit-card companies are making.
You can read the entire story here (link).
Related Articles:
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Credit-Card Users Face Higher Fees, Rates
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
BY EMAIL
RSS 


23 comments:
Virgil, putting my Merrill Lynch card front and center was no accident. I'm taunting you. Haha.
Great find once again CM. Future looks very bleak for all. A few bad apples sure do spoil the bunch!
I am keeping very tight reins on my credit cards. I plan to pay cash for all the gifts this season. I receive notice (via on-line) with my HSBC card that I can opt-out from getting a "default" rate before I receive my Feb 2009 bill. What the very, very small print stated that HSBC can increase my APR if anything adverse occurs, anywhere on my credit report, meaning even one late or over-the-limit on any credit card that I own. I suspect if I get a parking ticket, that would be grounds enough!
From what I have been reading and studying here and on credit boards, HSBC doesn't even need a reason to rate jack me. So, as soon as I can, I will be calling them and hope to speak to a nice CS rep (oxy-moron?) to see what my options are. I really don't trust HSBC or any other credit issuer anymore. If this could be done to someone with a very high FICO score and perfect credit, it can be done to anyone.
I have a toy limit on this card, $1500.00 and my balance is about $450.00. I'll probably have to close the card. Really, what should I do?
I missed the Chase $10 monthly service fee thing.
This should play out interestingly - we have a 2.99% for life Chase BT. Current balance about $5k, monthly interest ~ $13, minimum payment $100.
Wouldn't adding a monthly "service" charge be essentially changing my finance charge's percentage rate? Especially if said service charge applies only to card holders in my "bucket" - the ones slowly paying down a low % for life BT?
Cosmo, what you should do is keep it in perspective. Pay that $450 balance off as soon as you can. Then vow to pay in full on that HSBC card forever. In the grand scheme of things, a $450 balance isn't much. Even if you got jacked to 30% interest on that card, we're talking about interest of $130. That's the perspective I am talking about. It's a large interest rate but we're dealing with a fairly small interest assessment ($135 for a year).
You say you're using cash. My question is why not use the cards to make the purchases (so that you have purchase protection) and then pay in full when it's due? Is that not the same thing as paying with cash?
FLT, that's what it would be. It would be as thought you essentially got a rate hike on the card if you were assessed the $10 fee. Also, your minimum would go from 2% due to 5% due. That's where customers are going to get hammered.
FLT, not everyone is getting the service fee and new minimum. Have you received notification of the new fees?
Midnite, remember that the companies are also reeling from their own mistakes. It's not just the customers that are to blame. I think of a lot of this rate increase and fee jacking is related to the credit card companies' bad decisions. These companies are trying to make up for losses across their entire businesses.
There are certainly some bad-apple customers but I would argue that these companies are the biggest bad apples of all.
CM AKA BI:
I have book-marked the card's website.
:-p
Virgil, that's a step. Baby steps.
Do you ever have one of those moments that you should have realized long ago?
I just realized you probably photographed your own cards for the images...::duh::
Lion, that's funny. Yes, many of my pictures -- especially of credit cards -- are ones I took personally. Those cards you see in this particular picture are mine.
Ditto my CreditMattersBlog.com logo. Except those are my Web guy's credit cards instead of mine.
Back in the day, I used to have a picture of Bob Wang's wallet in the logo.
I really enjoy keeping my readers involved with the blog. Bob just needs to give me the cash that's inside his wallet. I'd be set.
Repost for FLT:
Nothing from Chase yet, but our statement cuts on the 5th. The thread at Creditboards.com implies that notices were sent in statements starting about the tenth.
Didn't Bob use to send you cash with each new blog entry?
FLT, you had the wrong web site address in your previous post. I deleted it and reposted for you.
As for Bob, he's no longer sending me cash. He just sends pictures of cash.
Very timely. I just got a notice TODAY regarding my 21 year old citicard. I have never carried a balance on this card, have a credit score of 785 (I checked fico today) on the report they checked and PIF on this and all my other cards. Never late anywhere on anything, nothing negative ever on my reports.
The notice said that as of 11/28 they are raising my rate from 8.99 to 16.99%. I guess I thought I was immune and was really shocked. The notice said though that if I call to opt out of the increased interest that the current interest will stay in effect until the card expires and then the account will close. I don't want this account to close because it is my oldest card. However, I did remove it from my wallet today and will use in only for a small purchase each month online to keep it active.
The credit crunch is trickling down my friends even to those of us who have done nothing, zero, nada risky.
Creditmatters, would you even bother to make a phone call on this to complain? I don't carry a balance anyway but its the principal of the thing. I'm thinking its best to not call because I'm afraid the rep may misinterpret what I'm saying and think i'm opting out and then the card will automatically close in 18 months when it expires. I think i should just leave it alone and not take that risk expecially since its an old card and has a huge limit on it.
New time, and I think this is just the beginning...
Anon, while I don't think a lot of creditors are willing to budge on these rate hikes, I do think that you can make a great case for yourself. Were it me, I would call and ask for a supervisor, though. Explain that your FICO score is 785 and that you pay in full. See why they insist on upping your rate. I would be very curious to hear about it, quite frankly.
Don't even mention anything about opting out when you call. Just ask a supervisor why you're receiving this rate. It's a punitive rate as far as you're concerned, especially when you are a prime customer in every way.
Check back in after you've talked with them.
I'm curious. By the way, I am also reposting your comment in another Citibank thread that I have on my blog. That's where everyone is checking in with their Citi rate hikes.
Thanks for the note. I look forward to hearing how things went.
Here's the story where I am reposting your comment: http://www.creditmattersblog.com/2008/11/citibank-to-raise-interest-rates-on-its.html
While I don't agree with the rate hikes AT ALL especially in cases where people have excellent scores and pay on time, maybe rate hikes will deter people from buying things they can't afford. I personally think the rate hikes are crap, but again, our society relies way too heavily on credit cards to obtain material things to show a status that is a false impression. Great blog!!
JG, I used to be one of those customers. I woke up three years ago. Used to carry balances on a regular basis. Changed my habits after we sold our house at the peak. It gave me an opportunity to really decide who I wanted to be.
Did I want to keep up with the Joneses? Or did I want to live within my means from there on out? I decided that I would pay in full from then on.
It seriously changed my life.
I don't wish harm anyone. I hope all of my readers get through this unscathed. I'm really hoping that they'll eventually get their debts paid down and start paying everything in full from there.
I used your link to check my fico (Thanks for the help a couple of nights ago!) My score is 793.
Today I received my holiday greeting form Citbank. They are raising my APR to a minumum of 19.99%
Anon, shoot me an email at plastic101@gmail.com.
I want to get a screen capture of that FICO score.
Be sure to post your story over at this thread:
http://www.creditmattersblog.com/2008/11/citibank-to-raise-interest-rates-on-its.html
I have a 740 credit score (checked it today also) and Citi raised me from 9.99% to 16.99%. I have never made a late payment...ever.
Anon, welcome to the party. You join a long list of customers who have high scores and impeccable payment records.
We feel your pain.
Thanks for posting.
Credit card companies are bunch of...you know. Love it when they send a surprise in the mail.
1. Take this new outrageous rate (for no reason) OR option out by closing your account so it can lower your credit score. FYI: credit score is so oxymoron. I bet credit card and credit score companies all work together. In this game...many ways to lose your points by bad behavior (credit risk), but no points for positive behavior (well, maybe in 1/100 point gain). If you pay on time-nope, no increase of credit score. If you pay in full, nope again. Only the credit score numbers go down in this game.
Sorry for the side track, back to the letter...
Triple punches in the stomach if I option out:
A. lower credit/debt ratio
B. oldest credit card history gone,
C. no "emergency" credit card
D. no future credit history to buy any other loans if needed (i.e. house, car, online purchase for safety, etc).
Having near perfect credit score, paid on time, etc....OK, I'll take the higher rate so I can get screwed again by our government. Our government gives out FREE tax payer money (BILLIONS) to support financial institutions and credit card companies while they are taking more of our hard earned money by raising interest rates because they think it's funny. I'm sure not laughing.
PS-If our government was so concerned about the credit card practices, they would have done something about it by NOW to protect the consumers...not in 2010. It's OK...we (the government) have to give some time for all the credit card companies to raise all the credit cards and screw the cardholders before any law gets passed.
Anon, let's address each of your points (A-D).
A, yes. That's a byproduct from having a card closed. You'll lose that limit for utilization purposes. Means that you will have to replace that limit (by getting another card), or use less of the remaining available credit still available to you through the rest of your cards.
B, not exactly. Your closed card remains on your credit report for another ten years (give or take a year or so). In the meantime, your closed card continues to age -- and you get the full benefit of that in your score.
C, if you don't have any backups to the closed card, you are correct. You won't have an emergency card to fall back on. That's one of the reasons I always talk about having backups on this site.
D, possibly. If you don't have any other credit products, you could eventually end up with little in the way of history. Just another good reason why you need to have a few open credit cards. If one card issuer pulls something with you, you can always turn to a different credit card.
Post a Comment